* I benefit from previous reflections on the burners with a friend who built and on the difficulty to drill holes at an angle Which led me to another solution. The novelty (if I am not mistaken!) Being that the air supply will be at the center of the vortex and not, as is the case when this supply is present, by the periphery: I hope to take advantage of the central depression to better inject. The vortex, as far as I can tell at this stage, will start from the bottom of the "riser": it is initiated by the spiral entry, then maintained by a supply of tertiary air whose flow will be oriented tangentially *. I have old gas cylinders in stock, but the diameter is too large (too bad!) And, on the other hand, I have a professional "channel" to get fire extinguishers. And the instructions seem to be increasingly strict). Anyway, the main problem is that it is not possible to recover in a dump (before it was possible, because I knew one of them was a practicing alcoholic and, with a few bottles of pastis, some got him close his eyes when he raised his elbow, but he is now retired. Yes, you're right, but the fire extinguishers used in public places perish quickly enough and are thrown away. (nota: anything that does not exist is not necessarily patentable of this fact alone. PS: I do not try to achieve anything patentable, since it is in open source. I was thinking of operating in the hot iron, but it was possible to use a hydraulic press and I had only to tinkle the curve on the anvil, cold. In the picture, the main duct was cut and part of the fall was formed to connect to the horizontal focus. Normally, the vertical tube will be isolated by pozzolan * contained by a body of extinguisher (still to be found. energy density, like ground miscanthus, because the "feeder" is too small (part on the right). However, I don't believe it possible to try fuels that are too low. Either way, I intend to make a basket to burn solid fuels into quite small fragments, like wafers or nutshells. It is planned to use several kinds of fuels: wooden menus, to please Dede and Chatelot and STEP granules, if I manage to get hold of them (it's a bit complicated since these people learned the word "recovery": they have not yet understood that it can coexist with "energy" !). (3) On rusted scrap (even slightly prepared), it is the best welding process: the mig does not appreciate. (2) From 6 M long! What to do a lot of tests. (1) It is important to start from recovery, because this is a first realization that will probably require modifications. Next step, cutting the vertical tube to a height of 100 and about half the circumference: this is more than what is necessary, but I prefer to cut further and detach the part that will ensure the junction Of spiral primer), because it will be easier to form outside the tube. So far, the fireplace parts are simply pointed at the arc (3) and this will probably be sufficient, as a perfect seal is not required at this level. It remains to make a cut in the vertical tube to make the junction of these two parts. As can be seen, the entrance of the gases is strongly offset, so as to initiate a vortex without using a restriction of the section, as is generally the case (which seems to me nonsense). In the picture, the vertical tube (riser) is attached to the fireplace The latter consists of 50 angles welded in a square to form a square tube. Since I have no certainty as to the ideal proportions or dimensions, my approach is purely empirical and the use of waste scrap serves me to decide in this area of design! I happened to find a 106 / 115 round tube (2) from a factory that was doing some work and I had new tools. It's a little lack of materials (recovery (1)) and hardware that has braked me in this project. After reviewing a lot of rocket stoves achievements, the idea has been thrusting into my mind for a while trying to synthesize the solutions that most caught my attention.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |